Home | Contact | Bookmark Trusted Choice | Sitemap

Top Rated Articles

free debt advice-believable




As there are numerous advertisments on TV on how to sort out you debts I

thought this NG would find this article from T R A D I N G S T A N D A R D

S N E T useful.



DEBT MANAGEMENT COMPANIES - WORTH THE EXTRA?





Anyone who has watched a lot of daytime television will be only too

aware of the huge advertising effort of debt management companies

such as Baines and Ernst to attract new customers.





Although perfectly legal some people have described debt managers

as parasitic and immoral. The debt managers negotiate with creditors

to reduce people's repayments, then distribute payments on their

behalf.

Reduced loan repayments have obvious attractions, but they also mean

debts take longer to clear - sometimes almost a lifetime.

One example was a customer who was paying off a £10,000 loan at £286

a month but then had monthly payments reduced by Baines & Ernst to £15.

This left the customer facing over 55 years to clear the debt and a

bad debt record for the whole period.





The costs don't end there as debt managers typically charge 15 per

cent of clients' monthly repayments or a standard minimum monthly

charge of for example £25.

It has been calculated that debt managers' charges add around £1,000

to the cost of an average loan.

Some firms also impose a penalty if people leave before clearing their

debts - potentially hundreds or even thousands of pounds.





The other aspect to the whole arrangement is that the debt management

companies cannot guarantee the agreement of creditors to withhold

sequestration proceedings or refrain from seeking court decrees against

the debtor. In many cases decrees will be granted against the debtor

as the instalment proposals offered by the debt management company

are unreasonable.

Against this background it is very difficult to see what benefit this

service (at an additional monthly charge) is to individuals who are

already in significant financial difficulties.





There are free alternatives to debt managers:

Citizens' Advice Bureaux and many trading standards departments and

Social Work Departments will also negotiate with creditors to agree

affordable repayment - FREE OF CHARGE, and lenders say they too are

keen to help borrowers who are struggling.

Most people are only going to these companies because they don't know

about the alternatives.





A report, commissioned by the Federation of Independent Advice

Centres (FIAC), found that many clients did not seem to understand

the payment system and were unaware they would forfeit their initial

payment should they break their contract with the company.

The report was undertaken because of widespread concern about debt

management firms, which range from one man bands to nationwide

operations.





The report also warned that the lengthy negotiations which some

debt management firms conduct with their clients' creditors

"mean that some clients could be making payments to debt management

companies for several months before any money is passed on to

creditors".





But FIAC also points out that some firms are much more client-friendly

and says the better ones help people work out affordable debt

repayment plans that they stick to. It argues that despite the

hostility of some creditors and providers of free debt advice,

debt management companies are not going to disappear and should

therefore be properly regulated.





This is certainly an area of great concern, and in a society where

more and more consumer credit is being given every year, there

should be greater regulation for firms who charge a fee to

reschedule debt. Ever decreasing resources for the providers of

free debt advice services such as local authorities, has meant

more and more profits for debt management companies, who charge

a significant amount of money to the people who can least afford

it - for a service which often achieves nothing or even increases

the debt burden.

any ideas?
_I think you're right. Every other advert on Cable seems to be for debt

management, by Carol Vordeman who should know better. Or for the equally

dubious ambulance chasers like Claims Direct.



Lets face it both leave a bad taste, as you know they're basically going

to screw vulnerable people. It's about time the contingency legal fee

legislation was revisited, and the various financial watchdogs (There

are oodles of them) took a long hard look at debt management.





The speed these companies are growing at alone gives cause for concern.



_The thing is that these so-called debt management companies give you

loans at a relatively high rate, charge you a whopping fee for doing

so (do they put that fee into the capital sum ?) and simply spread

your payments over an eternity, in the long run you end up worse off.





I hate the feeling that they are preying on vulnerable people and

agree with the description of these organisations in your post. These

people seem to offer an easy solution to a difficult problem, why on

earth do people use them instead of going to the Citizens Advice

Bureau or other free advice agencies ?

Other Articles