Home | Contact | Bookmark Trusted Choice | Sitemap

Top Rated Articles

Bad Credit Interest Mortgage Rate




I see that whilst the interest base rate has fallen by 0.25%, none of

the mortgage lenders have stated they will be reducing their rates.

This means that an extra 0.25% of every borrower's mortgage will be

profit for the lender. The economy will see little or no benefit, which

is the intention of the rate decrease.

As customers are often tied into their mortgage for some years, should

lenders be obliged to adjust their rates accordingly? After all, they

don't appear to hesitate to increase rates when the base rate rises.

Do mortgage lenders have a cartel to agree whether rate decreases will

be passed on to the customer? Would they like to influence the economy

by keeping rates artificially high, in which case why have a base rate?
For various reasons, when I bought my house, I took the Halifax's buildings

and contents insurance. Not the most suitable thing to do perhaps, but at

the time it made life a whole heap easier.

My mortgage is capped rate, but because of the way they calculate the

insurance premiums, when the interest rates last went up, my payments were

increased (by a matter of a couple of pounds). At no time after any of the

subsequent reductions in interest rates have they said they will reduce my

premiums. I am less than amused by this and, needless to say, now I have

the opportunity, I shall be taking my insurance business elsewhere...



Doesn't that depend on the difference between savings invested

with them and mortgages loaned by them? Also, as their incoming

mortgage interest rates are generally higher than their outgoing savings

rates, I'm really not sure.

If people use the mortgage/savings argument to disprove my question, why

is the decrease in base rates supposed to boost the economy? Surely

under such a scenario, the economy would be better for interest rate

increases as people's savings income would rise? It clearly doesn't

work that way.

Other Articles